Nasry Asfura declared winner of Honduras' presidential election

Honduran authorities on December 24, 2025, declared Nasry Asfura the winner of the country’s presidential election, concluding a process marked by weeks of delay, narrow margins, and sharp dispute. Asfura, a conservative former mayor of Tegucigalpa, secured just over 40 percent of the vote in a race where centrist candidate Salvador Nasralla finished slightly behind him. The election reflects a narrow shift in political leadership in the Central American nation and carries implications for regional dynamics.

The vote took place on November 30, but the official declaration was delayed nearly a month. Technical problems with reporting, accusations of irregularities, and a manual recount of a significant portion of ballots slowed the process. In the final tally, Asfura was confirmed to have edged out his nearest rival by a small margin. Asfura said he was ready to govern and pledged to focus on jobs, security, and education as he prepares to take office on January 27, 2026.

Asfura’s campaign carried the endorsement of former U.S. President Donald Trump. In the weeks leading up to the vote, Trump publicly supported Asfura and criticized other contenders, framing the election as a choice about national direction and security. The former president’s involvement drew criticism from opponents, who argued that public endorsements and comments about U.S. aid amounted to interference in Honduras’s domestic political process.

The election took place against a broader backdrop of political shifts in Latin America, where several countries have seen the rise of conservative leaders in recent cycles. Supporters of Asfura portrayed his victory as a reflection of popular desire for change, economic opportunity, and strengthened ties with friendly governments, including the United States. U.S. officials congratulated Asfura and called on all parties to respect the results and ensure a peaceful transition, signaling Washington’s interest in regional stability.

Opposition figures, including Nasralla and members of the ruling party, disputed the outcome. They cited delays, reporting problems, and the certification process as undermining the legitimacy of the count. Some opposition leaders called for recounts or legal challenges, highlighting longstanding concerns about electoral transparency in Honduras.

International observers, including regional organizations, noted the procedural challenges but did not declare the results illegitimate. They emphasized the technical difficulties during vote counting while urging all parties to respect democratic processes and work toward a peaceful resolution. The tight results and procedural obstacles underscored the fragility of electoral administration in a country where confidence in institutions has often been tested.

Asfura’s platform focused on private investment, economic development, and strengthening public order. He indicated potential changes to foreign policy and emphasized policies aligned with conservative and pro-business interests. Analysts note that how these priorities will translate into concrete governance remains to be seen, particularly as Honduras faces persistent challenges such as poverty, migration, and institutional trust.

The election also raised questions about the role of external actors in domestic politics. Trump’s outspoken involvement, including public endorsements and commentary on U.S. aid, was unusual for a former U.S. president and prompted debate about the balance between influence and sovereignty. Some argue that such involvement can strain perceptions of legitimacy, while others contend that international voices inevitably affect domestic decisions, especially in nations with close economic and security ties to the United States.

In the coming weeks, Hondurans will observe the transition of power, which will test the country’s institutional resilience. Authorities on all sides have emphasized the importance of public order and civic participation. A peaceful and orderly handover is seen as essential for reinforcing democratic norms and public confidence, particularly after a closely contested election.

The outcome also intersects with broader debates in Washington and across the hemisphere about balancing support for democratic processes with respect for national sovereignty. As the new administration in Tegucigalpa assumes office, questions about governance, regional relations, and institutional credibility will continue to shape discussion in both Honduras and its international partners.

The narrow victory, disputed results, and high-profile endorsements highlight the complexities of contemporary elections in Central America. For Honduras, the weeks ahead will be crucial in determining whether political actors, institutions, and the electorate can navigate transitions peacefully and strengthen the country’s democratic foundations.

‍