.png)
George Clooney’s back in the headlines, and not for a movie. This time, it’s for a bit of political honesty—Hollywood’s favorite forbidden fruit. In an interview with CBS Sunday Morning, the actor said what most Democratic strategists have been whispering into their oat-milk lattes for months: making Kamala Harris the Democratic nominee “was a mistake.”
“I think the problem with Kamala,” Clooney said, “is that she had to run against her own record. And it’s very hard to win if the point of running is to say, ‘I’m not that person!’”
That’s not the kind of thing you say when your dinner invitations depend on Malibu’s political orthodoxy. But it’s the kind of thing you say when you’ve been around long enough to realize the applause doesn’t last forever—and neither does the illusion that your opinion changes the world.
Clooney isn’t wrong. He’s just late. The idea that Harris’s candidacy felt more like an obligation than a movement isn’t new. Democrats coronated her instead of letting her fight for the throne. No battle scars, no sweat, no authenticity. Politics without a struggle is like a bar with no drunks—it doesn’t feel real.
When Clooney wrote his New York Times op-ed in 2024—“I Love Joe Biden, But We Need a New Nominee”—he was trying to play the wise old friend. He wasn’t throwing stones at Biden or Kamala; he was saying what every honest person at a D.C. cocktail party muttered before checking who was within earshot: we need a candidate who’s tested, not anointed.
But here’s the thing. George Clooney isn’t a party strategist. He’s an actor, a producer, a man who’s sold more tequila than policy ideas. And that’s okay. Hollywood is full of people who believe awareness equals change. They throw galas, host fundraisers, write checks with one hand and apology tweets with the other.
Still, there’s a difference between having a platform and having a point. Clooney’s right that the Democrats avoided a primary fight like it was gluten, but he’s not the oracle of Omaha. He’s George Clooney, not George Soros. Maybe he can play Soros in a movie—but let’s not pretend he’s pulling any geopolitical strings.
So yeah, George, drink your tequila. Thank capitalism for the mansion on Lake Como. But let’s not act like Hollywood saves democracy. It doesn’t. It can’t even save the box office.
The truth is, Clooney’s critique hit a nerve because he’s describing the exact disease Hollywood politics has given Washington: a performative obsession with optics over outcome. The Democrats picked a candidate who looked right for the poster but never tested whether she could headline the tour. They wanted the brand without the bruises.
Harris is smart. Ambitious. Charismatic in the right light. But she also walked into a buzzsaw built from her own résumé—California’s top cop, prosecutor, Vice President to a man whose approval ratings were melting faster than a popsicle in Palm Springs. You can’t run from your past if it’s all over YouTube.
Clooney’s mistake wasn’t saying the quiet part out loud. It was believing that saying it matters. The political machine doesn’t stop because a celebrity has a moment of conscience. It chews up sincerity, repackages it as a segment on Morning Joe, and moves on before the next commercial break.
Still, there’s something refreshing about his candor. Hollywood rarely admits when it’s wrong—especially about politics. It’s a culture that believes good intentions are the same thing as good ideas. But Clooney, maybe without realizing it, held up a mirror to the system he’s been part of: an industry that loves symbolism more than substance.
The irony is delicious. A man who’s spent his career pretending to be other people pointing out that Kamala Harris had to pretend she wasn’t herself. It’s almost poetic. The actor calling out the performance.
If you zoom out, it’s not even about Kamala or George. It’s about the broader hangover of performative politics—the celebrityization of ideology. Everyone wants to be the face of something. Everyone wants to tweet about justice from the back of a chauffeured SUV. Meanwhile, voters are out here trying to pay rent, wondering why their champions always sound like marketing executives.
Clooney’s not wrong about the campaign being a mistake. But maybe the real mistake is pretending that politics is still about ideas. It’s not. It’s about narrative. Image. Believability. You don’t win because you’re right anymore—you win because you feel right.
And that’s where the Democrats stumbled. They mistook identity for authenticity. They forgot that being “historic” doesn’t automatically make you electable. The voters aren’t buying what the casting directors are selling anymore.
So, George, you did your part. You said what everyone else was thinking. But politics isn’t a movie. There’s no director to yell “Cut!” when it all goes off script. You can’t fix bad casting with better lighting.
In the end, maybe the best advice for Clooney—and everyone else who thinks a headline equals a movement—is simple: play your part, but know your lane. You’re not changing the system by writing an op-ed. You’re just giving us something to talk about over coffee.
Now pour another tequila, look out over Lake Como, and toast to capitalism—the system that made you rich enough to care about democracy.
Because at the end of the day, the world doesn’t need another Hollywood savior. It just needs a little less acting.
